revolution etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
revolution etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

5 Ekim 2020 Pazartesi

Gaffield on international law after the Haitian Revolution

Gaffield on international law after the Haitian Revolution

 Julia Gaffield (Georgia State University) has published "The Racialization of International Law after the Haitian Revolution: The Holy See and National Sovereignty" in the American Historical Review, 125:3 (June 2020), 841-68. Here's the abstract: 

The Haitian state shaped international definitions of sovereignty and national legitimacy after the Declaration of Independence in 1804. Haiti’s nineteenth century was not a period of isolation and decline; its first six decades were globally connected because the country’s leaders challenged their postcolonial inequality with diplomacy and state formation. This strategy aimed to establish Haiti’s membership in the “family of nations,” a central metaphor in European and American diplomatic, legal, and religious decision-making. In doing so, the Haitian state forced the Atlantic powers to redefine the boundaries of international relations. Haiti’s decades-long negotiations with the Catholic Church were tied to the racialization of the global hierarchy. After its Declaration of Independence, the Haitian state began clearing a theoretical path toward recognized sovereignty based on the dominant narrative that a society must be considered “civilized” on the world stage. But, as it cultivated internal policies and practices that rejected the dominant racist assumptions, these discriminatory ideologies became increasingly more explicit in international law.

Further information is available here

--Mitra Sharafi

23 Ağustos 2011 Salı

During and after the Revolution, why did the emancipation of slaves proceed very slowly in the northern states?

During and after the Revolution, why did the emancipation of slaves proceed very slowly in the northern states?

  • The northern states gave priority to slaveholders' property rights so that emancipation often was spaced out over several slave generations.

  • Very few northerners saw any contradiction between freedom for themselves and slavery for African Americans. 

  • Slaves were threatening violence in the northern states, causing many whites to retreat from their earlier willingness to support rapid emancipation.

  • Economically, slavery was becoming more viable and profitable in the North in the 1770s and early 1780s.

ANSWER: During and after the Revolution, The northern states gave priority to slaveholders' property rights so that emancipation often was spaced out over several slave generations.

8 Mayıs 2009 Cuma

The English Revolutions

The English Revolutions

The English Revolutions
In June 1647 soldiers kidnapped the king and demanded that parliament pay their arrears, protect them from legal retribution, and recognize their service to the nation.

Those in Parliament who opposed the army’s intervention were impeached and when London Presbyterians rose up against the army’s show of force, troop move in town occupy the city.

The civil war, which had come so close to resolution in 1647, had now become a military revolution.

Religious and political radicals flocked to the army and encouraged the soldier to support their programs and to resist disbandment.

New fighting broke out in 1648 as King Charles encouraged his supporters to resume war.

But forces under the command of Sir Thomas Fairfax (1612 – 71) and Oliver Crompton (1599 – 1658) easily crushed the royalist uprisings in England and Scotland.

The army now demanded that Charles 1 be brought to justice for his treacherous conduct both before and during the war.

When the majority in the Parliament refused, still hoping against hope to reach an accommodation with the king, the soldiers again acted decisively.

In December 1648 army regiments were sent to London to purge the two houses of Parliament of those who opposed the army’s demands.

The remaining members, contemptuously called the Rump Parliament, voted to bring the king to trial for his crimes against the liberty of his subjects.

On 30 January 1649, Charles 1 was executed and England was declared to be Commonwealth.

The monarchy and the House of Lords were abolished and the nation was to be governed by what was left of the membership of the House of Commons.
The English Revolutions